Q1: How is the scope of a delivery unit defined, and what does it include?
A: One unit covers one business scenario, and the scope is written down at the assessment stage: which data sources and systems are involved, which roles will use it, and which metric defines success. Deliverables include the production-ready application or agent, the supporting data and permission configuration, the security baseline, and documentation your team can pick up from. The timeline depends on source conditions and integration complexity, and is stated in the assessment conclusion rather than promised as a number up front. Requests outside the scope are noted and planned into the next unit, so both sides stay clear on what's in flight.
Q2: What does ongoing managed service include, and what does it not?
A: It includes outcome monitoring and alerting, model and prompt tuning, token and capacity cost tracking, minor adjustments, and a quarterly expansion review. It does not include development of new scenarios — that belongs to the next delivery unit, and we look at whether it's worth doing together at the quarterly review. Azure and Microsoft licence costs are paid by you directly and sit outside the managed service fee; we recommend listing them separately in the quote so they're easy to take through your own budget process.
Q3: Will your engineers be based on site with us?
A: Not long-term on site, but always present at the moments that matter — scenario assessment, workflow observation, integration testing, go-live and training all happen in person. Day-to-day development and iteration run remotely, with progress and output synced weekly. The advantage of working this way is that our effort goes into building up methods and reusable assets that make your later scenarios faster, rather than into hours spent on your premises.
Q4: Our data isn't ready. Can we still start?
A: Yes, provided the order is right. In most first units, a fair share of the effort goes into connecting data, settling definitions and drawing permission boundaries. None of it produces something you can demo, but it determines how far the results can be trusted. We usually suggest picking a first scenario with reasonably good data conditions, getting the foundation and the method running smoothly, and taking on the harder parts after that.
Q5: Some Microsoft services aren't available to our China entity. What then?
A: That is the first thing we confirm — where your tenant sits, which entity signs, whether data can leave the region, and whether there are overseas branches. The same business requirement leads to different workable architectures for a mainland-only entity and for a company with an overseas entity. NovaTech holds 21V CSP credentials alongside Hong Kong and Singapore CSP, so either side is workable. We settle this at the assessment stage before putting forward a solution and a price.
Q6: Will this lock us into one architecture?
A: We deliberately leave two exits. The first is the model layer: NovaHub Gateway provides a single entry point, so switching models doesn't change business code. The second is the delivery standard: every unit's acceptance criteria include your team being able to take it on and keep changing it, and deliverables come with documentation and knowledge transfer. The test is simple — if we stepped away, your own people could keep this running.